Posted in September 2011

Finding the right guest facilitator can make all the difference

This post is part of a larger series to address the most common myths, misconceptions, and excuses that chapters and members have regarding the LEAD Program.  Follow the entire conversation and get caught up on each of the issues we are addressing by clicking here.

4.      Myth: LEAD Chairmen and Committee members should serve as facilitators

As a general rule, students are not especially skilled or experienced facilitators.  Asking them to take on the burden of preparing for and delivering a quality session is oftentimes too much.  Guest facilitators should be utilized at every opportunity.

A guest facilitator is any individual who facilitates a LEAD session and is NOT a current member of the chapter. For example, chapter alumni who facilitate LEAD sessions are guest facilitators. However, guest facilitators are not limited to chapter alumni. Guest facilitators can also be faculty/staff of the university (e.g. a professor, the president of the university, or a nurse at the student infirmary). Further, guest facilitators can be parents, police officers, or other individuals from the community.

The role of the LEAD Chairman and Committee should be in organizing and managing the phase: scheduling sessions, recruiting facilitators, getting members to the sessions, reporting sessions, encouraging member use of and tracking the usage of the online components.  In this way, a chapter’s LEAD Chairman and Committee should be selected for their ability to manage, plan, and implement programs, not in their public speaking abilities.

In-depth facilitator guidance notes are available for all sessions in Phases I-IV as well as most of All Chapter.  Using these notes as a script, a facilitator will be able to provide a quality program that is interactive, covers all the objectives and learning outcomes of the intended session, and utilizes a format that promotes active learning and discussion.  Skilled facilitators or presenters with content-specific knowledge and experience are also a great resource.  For example, why not reach out to the campus counseling center to facilitate the Myers-Briggs personality types session or the judicial affairs office to host a session on conflict or controversy with civility.  Chances are good that these offices, and others on campus, already have their own workshops and presentations to effectively address these topics.  Feel free to have them conduct their own session rather than sticking directly to the LEAD facilitator notes.

Why you should use guest facilitators:

  • They have “real world” experience;
  • The chapter members do not know these people, which is intriguing;
  • The chapter members hold the individual in high regard and respect their advice;
  • They are “experts” in their field based on their life experiences;
  • They are more willing to challenge chapter members and make them think outside the box;
  • They want to teach the chapter members something, meaning they care and the chapter members recognize this and respond to it.

Sounds good right?  So how do we go about finding and recruiting these people?

Some simple guidelines for involving guest facilitators in a chapter’s LEAD programming.

Step 1: Decide which sessions you want or need guest facilitators. For Phase I, guest facilitators should be used for at least 3/10 of the sessions. Phase II, should have guest facilitators for 6/8 of the sessions. For Phase IV, guest facilitators will be needed/desired for 6/6 of the sessions. In All Chapter LEAD, guest facilitators should be used for at least 2/6 of the sessions and it is recommended to have guest facilitators for 4/6 of the sessions.

Step 2: Meet with the Greek Advisor or Faculty Advisor to get names of possible guest facilitators for the LEAD phases and sessions that you’ll focus on this semester/quarter/year. Also refer to your campus directory.

Step 3: Contact Guest Facilitators to see what dates they are available to facilitate a session.

Step 4: In LEAD Committee meetings, set the date, time and location for the ses­sions. Reserve meeting space for the session if necessary. Order all the materials needed for sessions. The list of needed materials is included in the facilitator notes for each session.

Step 5: Two weeks before the session send the guest facilitator the session guidance notes (Xerox them for the facilitator or provide the password for the digital version). If a brother in the chapter is facilitating the session, meet with them and make sure they spend at least an hour and a half getting ready for the session.

If you are facilitating the session, make sure to spend at least an hour and a half to review the session, add your own examples, ensure you have all materials and do a run through. Your prep time will make ALL the difference.

Step 6: Announce the session in chapter and instruct participants to review the online content prior to the date of the facilitated session. They should plan to complete any worksheets and print off the needed handouts. Make sure to tell the participants WHAT they will learn. Get them excited about the session! Then, remind them about the session and completing the online content the day before. Print a few copies of the handouts and worksheets (from the facilitator’s notes) for use at the session. Prepare any needed materials and confirm the room reservation.

Step 7: Thank the facilitator and recognize them in some way. Thank you notes and gifts (certificates, gift cards, blanket from the campus bookstore, etc.). Always follow-up within 48 hours of a session to thank the facilitator for their time and express to them how they helped the chapter (provide specific examples or changes as a result of their volunteering).

Guest Facilitator access to the online (user) content: To access the online portion of the LEAD Program (the participant experience, not the facilitator notes), guest facilitators will need to complete a request for guest facilitator access.  This form is found online and requires facilitators to identify the chapter/colony for which they will be facilitating.  Upon submitting a request, the guest facilitator will be provided a guest username and password via email, and should use the username and password to log in to the Members Area and access the online content.

What your chapter can learn from a resurgent magazine

By Nathaniel Clarkson

Print is dying, we’re always told, and there’s nothing we can do about it. Magazines and newspapers are losing readers–and revenue–to blogs and other forms of new media. There’s just no way print can compete when everything is stacked against them. Or can they?

The unfolding story of The Atlantic offers a refreshing counterexample to the idea that print is helplessly disappearing.

More generally, the magazine’s resurgence during a particularly hostile climate demonstrates for our chapters that achieving success against the odds is quite possible (and the perceived odds are often illusory).

The following story also provides a number of other lessons for student leadership organizations looking to reach the next level.

Reports Ad Week:

For eight years, [Bradley] been trying to staunch the flow of red ink at what was then called the The Atlantic Monthly, only to see the losses increase (one year, to more than $10 million).

On recruiting the right people (values-based recruitment):

When the story of The Atlantic’s turnaround is told, the credit tends to go to the 58-year-old Bradley. But Bradley himself believes his greatest talent is finding talent, and he gives the majority of the credit to Smith, who he calls “unmatchedly gifted.”

On the importance of innovation (i.e. not getting caught up in what “everyone else is doing”):

By rethinking everything about the company, however, Smith found a way to make that pay. Think Silicon Valley, but without the free food and massages. (Smith did away with perks like free bagels in the mornings.) “We don’t have foosball machines, but we filter for entrepreneurial talent,” Smith says.

On admitting mistakes:

Bradley, looking back, is candid about his own failings.

The Atlantic’s losses mounted quickly under Bradley’s hands-off ownership style, growing from $4.5 million to more than $10 million. [...] Realizing he had to be more involved, he then tried every fix he could think of: He upgraded the paper stock, moved subscription prices up, then down, took advertisers on exotic retreats, to no avail.

==> People make mistakes and chapters err. Acknowledge the mistake, fix it and move on.

Again on the importance of innovation and reinvention:

“One of the great flaws in traditional media companies is they pay lip service to innovation,” Smith says. “They can’t restructure because they’re supertankers. They don’t reinvent themselves to their core.”

There will always be some reason to explain away poor chapter performance. “Numbers were down for everyone this year.” “Every other student organization hazes too.” “Our university president is anti-Greek.” (Have you ever asked her why?) “We’re waiting for the seniors to graduate to fix problem X.”

So what. The odds were against The Atlantic and they made it happen anyways. How will your chapter rise above the everything-is-against-us narrative and defy the trend to achieve excellence?

LEAD Myth #3 – LEAD is for Sigma Nu ONLY

This post is part of a larger series to address the most common myths, misconceptions, and excuses that chapters and members have regarding the LEAD Program.  Follow the entire conversation and get caught up on each of the issues we are addressing by clicking here.

3.      LEAD is for Sigma Nu ONLY

While the program was designed for and is primarily used by Sigma Nus, the content of the program is relevant for most individuals and groups.  With very few exceptions, LEAD sessions, and in fact entire phases, could be conducted with most college students and student groups.

Of the total library of sessions, very few are specific to Sigma Nu (e.g. History, PEP), and only a few more would only be relevant to members of Greek organizations (e.g. Fraternity, Ritual).  By and large though, at least 75% of the sessions are relevant for and have been designed with the general college student or group in mind.  With this information, chapters are encouraged to open up their sessions to a larger audience.

Some suggestions include:

  • Pairing with a sorority or other Greek organization to hold a joint session
    • All Chapter Module A Session 2 on Etiquette could serve as a great mixer or member date if done over a meal.
    • All Greek organizations need to do risk management and general chapter and personal development programming.  All Chapter is an ideal place to draw topics from.
    • Networking and career preparation sessions from Phase IV for the Greek (or campus) community
  • Incorporating LEAD into recruitment
    • Offering the Phase I Time Management session in a freshman dorm during the first few weeks of class.
    • Inviting prospective members to participate in Phase I sessions with the current candidate class OR hosting a Phase I session as a recruitment event (Fraternity, Leadership & Working Groups, etc.)
  • Using LEAD as a general PR tool
    • Working with Business Department faculty to host Phase IV sessions for the business school
    • Offering specific sessions or an entire phase (Phase II is popular) for campus leaders or any interested students through a semester long seminar series (sign up in advance or come as you choose models have both been utilized by chapters).

This general concept also applies to a chapter’s use of facilitators.  You do not have to be an alumnus, or have any experience whatsoever with the LEAD Program, to be a decent facilitator of the program or a specific session.  In fact, the program encourages the use of subject matter experts and experienced facilitators throughout the curriculum.  Guest facilitators can come from anywhere – staff, faculty, business leaders, community members, professional speakers, alumni, and in some cases even other students.

LEAD as a tool for building a better chapter

This post is part of a larger series to address the most common myths, misconceptions, and excuses that chapters and members have regarding the LEAD Program.  Follow the entire conversation and get caught up on each of the issues we are addressing by clicking here.

2.      LEAD doesn’t work – it won’t make me or my chapter any better.  Part 2 – LEAD as a tool for making members and the chapter better.

As we’ve mentioned before, this is probably our favorite myth.  Maybe that’s because refuting it is so basic to helping chapters and members buy into the program.  So we’re coming back to it to talk about the measurable improvements to individual members and chapters.

We’ve already looked at some examples of how LEAD can address the key experiences, skills, and knowledge that you wish for your members to have at specific points in the chapter.  Let’s take a look at some comparisons of the specific skills, experiences, and behaviors of members that have and have not experienced LEAD.

Those participating in the LEAD Program are significantly better off in key areas than LEAD non-participants.  Based on the Fraternity’s LEAD assessment (conducted by George Mason University’s Center for the Advancement of Public Health) we know that LEAD participants are significantly more likely than members who do not experience LEAD to*:

  • Recognize their personal strengths and weaknesses
  • Have more direction than before as a result of their participation in the LEAD Program
  • Look forward to change
  • Feel prepared to address the issue of others’ accountability for their own actions

As you can see, the LEAD Program is providing measurable, added value to the Sigma Nu membership experience.

In the simplest of terms, these significant differences continue to indicate that LEAD is better than any holistic homegrown programming offered at the local level and certainly better than no membership development opportunities at all.

Said another way, LEAD IS BETTER THAN NO LEAD!

Also of note is that as members experience more of the LEAD Program (multiple phases) these advantages and differences multiply.  Members that experience Phases I and II are significantly more likely than members that only use Phase I to*:

  • Believe the LEAD Program has helped them to hone their leadership skills and abilities
  • Believe the LEAD Program has helped them to grow and develop as an individual
  • Believe LEAD is worth the time and effort they put into the program
  • Believe LEAD has helped them develop stronger friendships with their fraternity brothers

Additional benefits can be seen when comparing those that use the entire program (Phases I-IV and All Chapter) when compared to those only using Phases I or I and II.  These members are significantly more likely to*:

  • Be aware when they make a decision that is not consistent with their values
  • Believe LEAD has helped them to grow and develop as individual
  • Believe LEAD is worth the time and effort they put into the program
  • Believe LEAD has helped them develop stronger friendships with their fraternity brothers
  • Believe the LEAD Program runs smoothly in their chapter

So what does this mean?  Very simply that MORE LEAD = MORE BETTER.  The more you do, the more benefits you see and the better off you are when compared to those that have had less exposure to the program.

The question remains then, if members that do LEAD are better off than those that have no membership development program (or even some locally created one not based on LEAD), and the more LEAD members experience the better off they are, then why wouldn’t your chapter be offering as much LEAD as possible?

*Data above is drawn from:

Anderson, D. S., & Hanfman, E. E. (2010).  Evaluation of the Sigma Nu Fraternity LEAD Program.  Unpublished manuscript, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.

Learn more about the Fraternity’s partnership with George Mason University in assessing the LEAD Program.

LEAD Myths and Misconceptions – Part 1

This post is part of a larger series to address the most common myths, misconceptions, and excuses that chapters and members have regarding the LEAD Program.  Follow the entire conversation and get caught up on each of the issues we are addressing by clicking here.

  1. LEAD doesn’t work – it won’t make me or my chapter any better.  Part 1 – LEAD as a tool for making the members and chapter better.

This is probably our favorite myth.  Maybe that’s because refuting it is so basic to helping chapters and members buy into the program.

One of the best ways to prove the utility of the program is to consider what your chapter already does, where it would like to improve, and what types of experiences, knowledge, skills, and abilities it would like for its members to have at some key points during their membership.

For example answer the following questions either on your own or with a group of chapter members and/or advisors.

  • Candidates – List all of the things that you feel Candidates should learn, gain, and experience as part of the candidate education program.  What should they know, be able to do, and have gained experience in by the time they become Knights?
  •  Officers – List all of the things chapter officers need to know and be able to do and be effective in their positions.  What skills, information, and experience do they need?
  • Graduates – List all of the skills and information you feel seniors should learn by the time they are ready to graduate.  What should they have learned in order to be successful?

Made your lists?  Great, now compare that to the session topics and objectives covered by the LEAD Program.  Without fail those lists will be almost entirely covered directly by whole or partial sessions or simply as a result of participating in LEAD.  Don’t believe us?  Let’s take a look at a few examples.

Here are some obvious responses for each of the questions above and the corresponding LEAD sessions that cover the knowledge, skill, or ability desired.

  • Officers
    • Goal setting and strategic planning experience – All Chapter LEAD sessions on Goal Setting and Strategic Planning
    • How to conduct an officer transition and knowledge of their position – All Chapter LEAD session on Officer Transitions
    • Delegation skills – All Chapter LEAD session on Delegation
    • How to run meetings and effective committees – All Chapter LEAD session on Effective Meetings
    • Fraternity policy and risk management – Phase I session on Risk Reduction

These are just a few examples but you probably get the idea.  We are confident that more than 75% of each of the lists you came up with are explicitly covered within the LEAD Program.

The question now is, if these lists truly express our desires and intended outcomes for these key stages of membership AND the LEAD Program represents a key tool we can easily use to achieve all or nearly all of the things on our lists, why wouldn’t we use LEAD?

Hopefully we will be able to answer your remaining questions and break down any additional barriers to your chapter and members utilizing LEAD in the remainder of our posts.

If you have additional questions or concerns that you would like for us to tackle please add them in the comments section below.

LEAD Myths & Misconceptions

By Director of Leadership Development Scott Smith

The keys to success for any local LEAD programming initiative are to make it relevant and accommodating to the specific chapter.  Above all, the LEAD Program is a tool to increase chapter performance, brotherhood, ethical leadership, and the overall member experience.  That being said, the old adage, “if the only tool you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail,” definitely applies to LEAD.  A skilled consultant, LEAD Chairman, or advisor knows that LEAD is more than a hammer and uses the program to achieve various goals and to meet almost any specific need or circumstance.

The following is a list of common myths and misconceptions that chapters, students, and alumni often hold about the LEAD Program.

  1. LEAD doesn’t work – it won’t make me or my chapter any better.  Part 1 – LEAD as a tool for making the chapter better
  2. LEAD doesn’t work – it won’t make me or my chapter any better.  Part 2 – LEAD as a tool for making individual members better
  3. LEAD is for Sigma Nu ONLY
  4. LEAD Chairmen and Committee members should serve as facilitators
  5. Phases and Sessions are numbered and must be implemented and presented in that order
  6. For it to count as LEAD it has to follow the facilitator guidance notes exactly 
  7. LEAD Phase III is hard to implement
  8. It doesn’t count as LEAD if the event includes anything other than the LEAD session
  9. LEAD is basically another lecture every week/month (it takes too much time)
  10. LEAD is all theory and has no real-world application
  11. LEAD can’t go on a resume or be discussed in a job interview
  12. Hard copy LEAD manuals are better than the new online sessions.
  13. LEAD is mandatory
  14. LEAD covers very basic information
  15. Got LEAD? There’s a session for that

Over the next few weeks we will address each of these myths and misconceptions here at the blog. We’ll explain why each myth doesn’t hold up, and we’ll provide the tools to push past the excuses and implement an effective and enjoyable LEAD Program.

Part of your job as a member of Sigma Nu (collegian, alumnus, officer, advisor, LEAD participant, or otherwise) is knowing that these are just that, myths and misconceptions, and effectively addressing them with chapters.

Help us out by following along and adding your own thoughts and responses in the comments section below.

If you have additional myths, misconceptions, or questions that you would like us to address then feel free to add those in the comments section as well.

Senioritis: searching for the cure

By Nick Claghorn (Indiana)

As of now, most colleges and universities have started the 2011-12 school year, which means thousands of students are in their senior year. You may be one of those seniors and you look back on your college career and see that you’ve accomplished a great amount. Senioritis may kick in (or already has) and you’ll experience a lack of motivation. Don’t let this be the death of you as an active fraternity member – there’s still plenty for you to do!

Thanks to my graduate professor, I have been introduced to a theory called the ‘Equity Theory’ which states that ‘individuals think about what they put in to the organization and then think about what they receive in return’ – pretty simple. The more you give, the more you receive. However, common sense would tell us that this is not always the case.

In the fraternity, there is a democratic society of executive board members and committees. The group decides what is best for themselves by establishing order and fairness, and the votes go as the company/organization go. If it goes well, you create an environment conducive to ample opportunities for organizational (and personal!) growth. Here’s where I believe motivation can be the most successful. I’ll go over motivation by discussing three common myths about motivation:

Myth #1: “I can motivate people”

–Not really.  People have to motivate themselves.  An organization can set up an environment where motivation produces positive results for the fraternity member. Many seniors slack on their influence because they believe that they’ve put in all the effort they can during their time as a chapter member. One of the reasons they may think like that is because they don’t see the return value for them because they’ll be out of school in a few months anyways. Younger members look to the senior members, see their apathy, and reflect it in their treatment of the organization. If you, as a senior, find yourself in this situation, remind yourself that this is a lifetime commitment to Sigma Nu and that the rewards will continue past your student years.

Myth #2: “Fear is a damn good motivator”

–Fear can be a great motivator for a short period of time. ‘Can be’ and ‘short’ are two fragments in the last sentence that tell the tale. Putting fear into someone to complete a task or assignment will not produce results for worthy, established chapters in the long-run.

Myth #3: “I know what motivates me, so I know what motivates my [chapter brothers].”

–Different people are motivated by different things. Not everyone moves at the same pace or creates the same opportunities for themselves, but, according to Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs, everyone is motivated by the same five categories of needs!

  1. Physiological: Need for water, food, and air
  2. Safety: Need to be safe from harm
  3. Social: Need for friendship and acceptance
  4. Esteem: Need for recognition and respect
  5. Self-actualization: Need to maximize one’s potential

Numbers 1 and 2 are almost 100% the same for every individual and it is believed that necessary fulfillment of these needs must come first in order to satisfy the remaining needs. It is numbers 3, 4, and 5 that compound the complexity of the human character.

You, as a senior, have seen the ups and downs of the chapter throughout your time as a collegiate member and may be the best person in your chapter to identify what needs are not being met.

We normally achieve high levels of positive social need through Sigma Nu but not everyone experiences it the same. Are there members who may be struggling in this area? Have you tried to help?

The fraternity provides opportunities for organizational achievement and recognition, which can positively influence respect. Is your chapter recognizing the outstanding performers?

And self-actualization deals internally within the individual. He must recognize that he can achieve better and, by doing so, will strive to make himself (and others around him) better.

Your chapter stands by the same values as all the others: Love, Honor, and Truth. Motivating your chapter to get the most out of your fellow members may be the most rewarding – and challenging – task you will attempt in your young life. By doing so, you may satisfy your own need for recognition and respect, as well and realizing that you are maximizing your own potential.

Forget hugs, I need a handshake

By Associate Director of Leadership Development Alex Combs

The handshake.  It’s pretty remarkable how a simple gesture can convey such a powerful message.  Indeed, a true testament to the importance of non-verbal communication.  We use the handshake to greet, say farewell, congratulate, even size-up our fellow man.  But do we use it enough in our work together?  I was struck by this thought while reading an article in Harvard Business Review exploring that very concept.

Today’s business world is teeming with contracts.  Unsurprisingly, the same applies to Greek life, as well.  We are infatuated with laying out every expectation and rule for our undergraduates and creating contingency plans for the unexpected, down to every foreseeable detail.  Amidst terms & conditions clauses, insurance affidavits, recognition agreements, accreditation programs, and the like, we must admit there is little room left to the free-will of undergraduates, whether that be of an insidious or altruistic nature.

Granted, many of us believe these to be necessary evils to a system fraught with liability and engulfed by insurance policy, perhaps accurately so.  But is it ever considered that the very contracts we use to preserve our working relationships might be doing more to decay them, instead?  Maybe then we wouldn’t be so quick to believe these as necessary.

The point – an agreement over a handshake can set the general guidelines to a relationship, while leaving room for common sense and goodwill to govern actions when those unexpected or unforeseen circumstances arise.  However, with contracts, they set out to explicitly define what could otherwise be governed by social norms, removing our responsibility to adhere to common sense and instead obsess over the details of the contract.  Therefore, anything not stated in the contract is free game.

It’s simply paradoxical that the more we try to define expectations, the more we leave unsaid.  The more specific I state my parameters, the more parameters I’m forced to specify.  This can go on to a seemingly limitless degree, much to the detriment of not only our relationships – being based more on distrust than trust – but also our performance.

In the article, a CEO describes one of the worst decisions of his career.  He set out to develop a detailed performance evaluation that would guide decisions on raises, bonuses, and benefits.  He thought it would increase transparency and understanding of the ideal performance.  He was wrong.  Instead, his employees only cared about meeting those terms, regardless of whether or not it was to the benefit of coworkers or the company.  Ultimately, morale and overall performance tanked.

Perhaps that is why honor codes are often so simplistic.  It sounds like something you would agree to over a handshake.  I must admit, having managed many students and consulted many chapters, I’ve expected a lot of things from many people.  But I’m never more confident about those expectations being met as I am when I can look that person in the eyes and say, “I’m counting on you to do the right thing.” Then we follow that with a handshake.

Source:  Ariely, D. (2011, March). In Praise of The Handshake.  Harvard Business Review, 40.

Time to stop blaming the media and start living the ritual

By Leadership Consultant Spencer Montgomery

In such a short history, fraternities have evolved immensely and have experienced a vast shift in cultural identity. Many would suggest the only constant among all this change has been the values we say we represent, but are we sure about that?

Over the past few months, I have questioned what fraternities actually represent; not by what we say, but what we do.  This question demanded that I take a closer and more detailed look, so I decided to follow “fraternity” via Google’s alert system for the past month and see what was being reported on the Greek life I love so much.  To say the least, I was beyond disappointed.

Turns out, there has been a lot of negative coverage on fraternities lately.  It seems as though the media is relentless in their pursuit to find any and all negative byproducts of this system.  I can hardly blame them; no more than I can blame the media for those actions being made in the first place.

Too often, we jump to the same tired defense, arguing that the media fails to report all the good we do.  But is the good we do good enough?  Have we reached a point where we truly believe that six community service hours justifies the mental distress of an 18 year old?  Do we think raising 6,000 dollars can replace a life?

Like it or not, these horrible acts are committed.  And yes, they will always be the only aspect of fraternity reported by the media.  But is pointing out the good we do even an appropriate response?  It’s like we just accept this behavior as a necessary evil to all the good we do.  I just can’t bring myself to believe that.

Instead of fighting against what is reported, let’s give the media nothing to report.  We say we hold ourselves to a “higher standard” yet too often there is a report of alleged hazing or sexual assault by a fraternity member.  Look, we will never be able to control what is reported, but the one thing we can control is our actions.  Let’s stop playing into the stereotypes that we created.

I guess what I’m asking is at what point will we truly do what we say we do, without exception.  Reaching that point includes everyone in the community. Regardless what you think your level of guilt is in all of this, if you’re not doing something to actively stop those who are, you’re not doing anything to help our cause either.  Remember, the next time you turn your eye to what you think is minor hazing, it was that same bystander behavior that led to the death of an 18 year old being the top story on CNN.com.

Are we so far off the beaten path that we can’t come back to the pure state that we once were? Are we so concerned with fulfilling social norms that we dismiss the very reason we exist as an organization? Is the type of man that our fraternities originally sought even relevant anymore?

If you are looking for an answer, I don’t have them.  Sorry.  What I do know is that I took a vow to my organization, promising to be a better man and to make a difference. I’m committed to this vow. I commit to never giving up on our high ideals. I truly believe in Fraternity.

I’d like to challenge the fraternity men who continue to dismiss the values by which they vowed to live:  I challenge you to start living to our high standards and stop making those men doing the right thing defend your actions with their own.  I challenge you to stop giving the media stories to report.  I challenge you to earn your place in this Greek life I love so much.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.